Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?
Date: 2007-08-03 23:36:15
Message-ID: 200708031636.16326.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> In any case this is getting pretty darn far away from a one-liner patch.
> I think it needs more thought and more testing than we can spare now.

I'm still hoping that we can show that a moderate increase (say 24 or 32)
has no noticeable effect on other workloads. Haven't had time to run the
other workloads yet, though ...

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-08-04 01:26:22 Re: COPYable logs
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-08-03 22:16:44 Re: clog_buffers to 64 in 8.3?