| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Future of krb5 authentication |
| Date: | 2007-07-18 13:01:26 |
| Message-ID: | 200707181501.28368.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2007 13:21 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> The main reasons would be to have less code to maintain,
I don't think the krb5 support has needed all that much maintenance in the
last few years.
> and to make life
> easier for packagers. For example, win32 would no longer need to ship the
> kerberos binaries in the package (and update it properly etc).
Nobody is forcing anyone to ship anything anyway.
> But sure, we might leave it in there until there's a direct problem with it
> (other than the ones we already know). Can I still get my deprecation of it
> though? ;-)
You might want to inquire about that on -general.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-07-18 14:32:02 | Re: Future of krb5 authentication |
| Previous Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2007-07-18 12:50:43 | Re: Updated tsearch documentation |