Re: shmctl EIDRM preventing startup

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shmctl EIDRM preventing startup
Date: 2007-07-02 11:05:35
Message-ID: 20070702110535.GC12254@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:39:01PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Maybe what is happening is that an entirely unrelated process created a
> > segment with that ID, attached to it, and then it was deleted. I don't
> > know how to check however.
>
> AFAIK, EIDRM should imply that the segment has been IPC_RMID'd but still
> exists because there are still processes attached to it. So the thing
> to look for is processes still attached. Not 100% sure how to do that,
> but I'm sure the info is exposed under /proc somehow...

If it's installed, this:

lsof |grep SYSV

Will list all processes attached to a SHM segemtn on the system. I
think ipcs can do the same. You can grep /proc/*/maps for the same
info.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message cha 2007-07-02 11:32:31 importing limited set of rows/tuples
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2007-07-02 09:48:17 Re: table disk space usage query?