Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent
Date: 2007-06-18 18:06:30
Message-ID: 200706182006.31575.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Montag, 18. Juni 2007 18:16 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> - We do allow preffixes in certain cases.

It would certainly be fun to have a general units system, which you could use
for configuration and data in general. But that would definitely require
that we stay strict on what we allow, or you could do no meaningful things
with this in a safe way.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-06-18 18:15:26 Re: EXPLAIN omits schema?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-06-18 18:02:51 Re: GUC time unit spelling a bit inconsistent