Re: Numeric performances

From: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric performances
Date: 2007-05-31 19:25:27
Message-ID: 200705312125.27266.vincenzo.romano@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:42:20 Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> It is. But why do you care? You either have the correctness that
> NUMERIC gives, or you don't.

Because FLOAT8 can be precise enough for some application and not
enough for other ones.

--
Vincenzo Romano
--
Maybe Computer will never become as intelligent as Humans.
For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hackenberg, Rick 2007-05-31 19:53:22 Permission denied for sequence
Previous Message Anton 2007-05-31 18:49:28 how to use array with "holes" ?