Re: pgpool redundancy question

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: kevin(at)kevinkempterllc(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgpool redundancy question
Date: 2007-05-31 01:22:34
Message-ID: 20070531.102234.71103441.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Hi List;
>
> It seems that in a replication scenario pgpool becomes the single point of
> failure, i.e. if we loose the pgpool box were dead. Any thoughts,
> suggestions, best practices, etc per creating redundancy in the pgpool layer?
>
> I've posted to the pgpool list as well but I wanted to get some thoughts on
> how the postgresql community has dealt with this...

Try pgpool-HA.
http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Allison 2007-05-31 01:28:56 Re: removing a restriction
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-31 01:05:50 Re: removing a restriction