Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
Date: 2007-05-16 18:02:32
Message-ID: 200705161802.l4GI2WM12558@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > In talking to people who are assigned to review patches or could review
> > patches, I often get the reply, "Oh, yea, I need to do that".
> >
> > Folks, we are six weeks into feature freeze and have made slim progress
> > on getting patches reviewed and applied. As I stated earlier, we are
> > now looking at August/September for beta, but that might be pushed back
> > even later if we don't get more progress.
> >
> > It seems there is a lot of reliance on Tom to get the patches applied,
> > but I don't think that is fair or reasonable. I think we need more
> > urgency on the part of everyone to make faster progress. Patch
> > reviewers and committers need to take more initiative to get things done
> > rather than wait for some external force to prompt them.
> >
> >
>
> I at least feel uncomfortable about reviewing code that deals with areas
> I have not touched much, and where I feel the author probably knows a
> lot more than me. The chance of my catching errors/problems in such a
> case is much lower.

Yep, that is part of our problem, but even items people have already
said they _can_ review have shown little progress.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-05-16 18:06:26 Re: Lack of urgency in 8.3 reviewing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-16 17:54:46 Re: Invalid magic number in log file?