Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Date: 2007-05-14 13:19:52
Message-ID: 20070514131952.GF20472@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:02:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > If all we want to do is add a check that prevents two servers to start on
> > the same port, we could do that trivially in a win32 specific way (since
> > we'll never have unix sockets there). Just create an object in the global
> > namespace named postgresql.interlock.<portnumber> or such a thing.
>
> Does it go away automatically on postmaster crash?

Yes.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-05-14 13:34:05 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-05-14 13:16:26 Re: What is happening on buildfarm member baiji?