Re: Managing the community information stream

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Managing the community information stream
Date: 2007-05-08 14:50:01
Message-ID: 20070508145001.GH2735@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 07:36:55AM -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:

> Instead, if all feature requests are tracked then users can vote on
> what's most important to them.

I am sympathetic to the issues you and Andrew are describing (I
understand Bruce's stream analogy, but I think Andrew is right that
from the user's point of view, it's not usable). But I am not
convinced that users voting on desired features will get us the
users' desired features. The features we get are mostly the features
that have attracted developers. The method by which that attraction
happens is interesting, but I don't think it's democratic.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
Information security isn't a technological problem. It's an economics
problem.
--Bruce Schneier

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-05-08 15:02:30 Re: [COMMITTERS] psqlodbc - psqlodbc: Put Autotools-generated files into subdirectory
Previous Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2007-05-08 14:35:44 Re: Feature lists for 8.3 and 8.4