Re: Feature freeze progress report

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze progress report
Date: 2007-05-03 17:26:43
Message-ID: 200705031026.44043.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Bruce,

> Get rid of gborg and let's talk.

Touche'.

Actually, AFAICT, the only active thing left on GBorg is WWW. If we move
that, we can shut it down. Any objections?

> Why am I having to spend hours in Syndey saying the same thing?  Why
> don't you guys go ahead and change things, and when they fail, I will
> still be around.

You're acting as a majority of one, here, Bruce. The reason why any solution
anyone else tries *will* fail is because you will refuse to participate in
it. That's why people are trying to persuade you instead of just going ahead
and doing it; you have the power to effectively sandbag anything anyone else
does, so that's why nobody wants to put effort into it if you're opposed.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-03 17:47:48 Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze progress report
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-03 16:43:29 Re: Feature freeze progress report

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-03 17:47:48 Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze progress report
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-03 16:43:29 Re: Feature freeze progress report