Re: What about SkyTools?

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, dmitry(at)koterov(dot)ru
Subject: Re: What about SkyTools?
Date: 2007-04-12 00:28:34
Message-ID: 200704112028.34698.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 12:08, Dmitry Koterov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Have anybody used SkyTools in production environment?
> What's the impression? In practice - is it now more preferrable than Slony
> or not yet?

Well, skype using them in production... I think the general consensus of the
postgresql community is that slony is still the preferred choice, but on
number of deployments and general community knowledge, assuming you need
master/slave style replication. Everything else is still considered fairly
green technology, though that's no reason not to test it in your environment.
IMHO YMMV

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message chrisj 2007-04-12 01:29:50 is there a way to determine the attributes of anyelement
Previous Message Leon Mergen 2007-04-11 22:46:19 hashtext & collisions