| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Vista/IPv6 |
| Date: | 2007-04-11 18:04:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20070411180450.GB7401@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 02:03:11PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 17:06 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> >
> >>There is a configure time and a runtime check. The code is below - note
> >>the first #ifdef.
> >>
> >
> >Yeah, the problem is that the msvc build has no intelligence to detect the
> >IPv6 APIs to define HAVE_IPV6. So that needs to be developed.
> >
> >
>
> The configure test just looks for a definition of struct sockaddr_in6.
> Taking a quick look It seems to me like this is unconditionally there in
> the MSVC WS2tcpip.h , so maybe we should just force it for MSVC.
That was my question. I just built with ipv6 enabled using my msvc build on
my primary machine which does *not* have ipv6, and it still passes
regression tests fine.
Given that we have a runtime check, is there any reason at all not to
enable ipv6 on all builds on msvc?
(FWIW, it's been in the platform SDK at least since Windows 2000)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-04-11 18:24:08 | Re: Vista/IPv6 |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-04-11 18:03:11 | Re: Vista/IPv6 |