Re: Fate of pgsnmpd

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Date: 2007-04-07 21:53:55
Message-ID: 200704071453.56377.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh,

> Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot
> easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first.
> Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't
> cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want
> to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific
> MIB..

FYI, the MySQL folks want to talk to you about maybe lobbying to change the
RFC. They feel that an awful lot of RFC1697 is Oracle-specific, and are
wondering if we can do anything about it.

Anyway, if you want to ping them, Brian Aker <brian(at)mysql(dot)com>.

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Tolley 2007-04-07 22:39:15 Re: Fate of pgsnmpd
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-04-07 21:29:13 Re: Fate of pgsnmpd