| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, "Matthew O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, " =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Devrim=20G=FCnd=FCz?=" <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, "'Joshua D(dot) Drake'" <jd(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |
| Date: | 2007-04-06 15:36:58 |
| Message-ID: | 200704061636580000@1850115920 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
> To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
> Sent: 06/04/07, 15:33:20
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for?
>
> yeah improving windows coverage might be a nice thing - some other
I'm awaiting an animal for 2k3R2/VC++ Express, and have a Vista/Visual Studio VM almost ready as well.
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-04-06 16:22:55 | Re: Auto Partitioning |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-04-06 15:04:13 | Re: What X86/X64 OS's do we need coverage for? |