From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Luke Lonergan <LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Sherry Moore <sherry(dot)moore(at)sun(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Doug Rady <drady(at)greenplum(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant |
Date: | 2007-03-27 01:04:57 |
Message-ID: | 200703270104.l2R14vx16179@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon, is this patch ready to be added to the patch queue? I assume not.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 09:14 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 16:21 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>
> > > With the default
> > > value of scan_recycle_buffers(=0), VACUUM seems to use all of buffers in pool,
> > > just like existing sequential scans. Is this intended?
> >
> > Yes, but its not very useful for testing to have done that. I'll do
> > another version within the hour that sets N=0 (only) back to current
> > behaviour for VACUUM.
>
> New test version enclosed, where scan_recycle_buffers = 0 doesn't change
> existing VACUUM behaviour.
>
> --
> Simon Riggs
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-03-27 01:36:58 | Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 00:52:47 | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |