| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Mark Dilger <pgsql(at)markdilger(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: patch adding new regexp functions |
| Date: | 2007-03-27 00:52:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200703270052.l2R0qlx14787@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > AFAIR, the reason there's no TextPGetDatum (and ditto for lots of other
> > datatypes) is lack of obvious usefulness. A function dealing with a
> > "text *" doesn't normally have reason to convert that to a Datum until
> > it returns --- and at that point PG_RETURN_TEXT_P is the thing to use.
> > Do you have a counterexample, or does this just suggest that the regexp
> > function patch needs some refactoring?
>
> If you are asking why I have reason to convert text * to a Datum in cases
> other than PG_RETURN_TEXT_P, it is used for calling text_substr functions
> using DirectFunctionCallN. BTW, this usage of text_substr using
> PointerGetDatum was copied from the pre-existing textregexsubstr function.
Is there a follup patch based on this discussion?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 01:04:57 | Re: Bug: Buffer cache is not scan resistant |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 00:39:54 | Re: TOASTing smaller things |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 01:07:41 | Re: Numeric patch to add special-case representations for < 8 bytes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-03-27 00:50:48 | Re: Improvement of procArray.xmin for VACUUM |