Re: ILIKE and indexes

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ILIKE and indexes
Date: 2007-03-18 19:17:06
Message-ID: 20070318191706.GE5722@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:30:35PM +0100, Guillaume Smet wrote:
> I have planned to write the operator class as a "contrib" module but I
> couldn't find the link between LIKE operator and text_pattern_ops
> opclass which uses ~=~ and all its variants. Andrew from Supernews
> told me it was hardcoded in the planner so the introduction of this
> new opclass requires a few changes to the planner to take it into
> account for ILIKE.

Er, it's link between LIKE and the ~=~ that's hard coded, however the
link between the operator class and the operator is nothing special,
that's why it's an operator class.

So I think it's easier that you think: just build the operator class
and make sure you use the right operator so the planner uses it. ILIKE
already maps to an operator...

Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Islam Hegazy 2007-03-18 19:48:45 modifying the table function
Previous Message Jaime Casanova 2007-03-18 19:05:07 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC temp_tablespaces to provide a default location for