| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Postgresql-General <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is CheckPoint.undo needed for? |
| Date: | 2007-02-22 18:02:41 |
| Message-ID: | 20070222180241.GL4276@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> >>Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>>No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never
> >>>actually implemented. It's dead code.
> >>>
> >>>Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>>>Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword
> >>>>
> >>>>Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>>>>>What am I missing?
> >>>>>Seems, it's about that
> >>>>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php
> >>Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-)
> >
> >So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for
> >future readers as well ;-)
>
> Here you go. I'm not subscribe to pgsql-patches, so I posted this here.
I think you should increase pg_control version.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-02-22 18:02:52 | Re: Column storage positions |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-02-22 18:00:58 | Re: SCMS question |