| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_proc without oid? |
| Date: | 2007-02-19 18:30:21 |
| Message-ID: | 200702191930.22001.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> SQL script maybe, much along the lines Greg was just mentioning.
I would welcome that, although a similar suggestion was rejected a few
years ago, which is why I didn't pursue it here.
> you can't just decide to leave out a few OIDs on the
> spur of the moment.
I still don't understand why that would be a problem, aside from the
fmgrtab problem that is specific to pg_proc. Other system catalogs
also have mixed entries with and without explicit OIDs.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-02-19 18:34:17 | Re: Short varlena headers and arrays |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Smet | 2007-02-19 18:21:00 | Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch - INSERT-able log statements |