Re: Small request re error message

From: Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>, "pgsql-general postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Small request re error message
Date: 2007-02-16 21:56:23
Message-ID: 20070216165623.4e859881.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

In response to Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>:

> Scott Ribe wrote:
> > Could the below message be modified:
> >
> > The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272, but
> > the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822.
> >
> > By also showing the version numbers in hex, like so:
> >
> > The database cluster was initialized with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 906166272
> > (0x36030000), but the server was compiled with PG_CONTROL_VERSION 822
> > (0x00000336).
> >
> > This would have saved me a couple of minutes' worth of puzzlement. With Macs
> > out there that look identical between the PPC and x86 versions, this kind of
> > error has gotten a lot easier to make ;-)
>
> I don't understand how the hex values help.

With the hex values, it becomes immediately obvious that the problem is
caused by endianess (to me, anyway)

--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2007-02-16 22:02:09 Re: Priorities for users or queries?
Previous Message Benjamin Arai 2007-02-16 21:56:08 Re: Priorities for users or queries?