Re: I "might" have found a bug on 8.2.1 win32

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: I "might" have found a bug on 8.2.1 win32
Date: 2007-02-02 16:34:25
Message-ID: 200702021634.l12GYPg04457@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tony Caduto wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> >
> > What you are saying is that because you don't believe in the pgpass
> > design, you are going to summarily delete them - which I know for
> > absolute sure would *really* annoy some pgAdmin users that I know for
> > a fact have a whole heap of passwords stored in theirs. Doing that
> > would only hurt your products reputation, not mine.
> >
> Dave,
>
> My product is not storing passwords using pgpass without the users
> knowledge.
> If pgAdmin III stored it's own passwords in the registry it would be up
> to the user (as it should be) to use pgpass.
> If they chose to use pgpass, libpq would override the passwords stored
> in the registry anyway, which is what pgAdmin III is doing
> automatically to my application without my or my users consent.

You can disable reading .pgpass by defining the PGPASSFILE environment
variable to point to a non-existant file. This works for all
applications that use libpq.

Here is a funny parable about what happens when you try to please
everybody:

http://www.bartleby.com/17/1/62.html

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. 2007-02-02 16:36:59 Re: Postgres SQL Syntax
Previous Message Dave Page 2007-02-02 16:28:09 Re: I "might" have found a bug on 8.2.1 win32