From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Karen Hill <karen_hill22(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 |
Date: | 2007-01-29 22:49:40 |
Message-ID: | 200701292249.l0TMne329515@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
Ray Stell wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 01:27:19PM -0800, Karen Hill wrote:
> > there any worry in the community that oracle will begin to target
> > postgres like they're targeting mySQL?
>
> I attended a big ora conference in 2006 and was a bit surprised to
> observe the fact that ora corp keynote addresses did not even mention
> a db. The big focus was the apps, their future. I think they have
> resigned themselves to those weak db sales. They can just charge
> what they like this week to the people who live on their apps.
Absolutely!
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chad Wagner | 2007-01-29 22:55:37 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 |
Previous Message | Ray Stell | 2007-01-29 22:26:07 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chad Wagner | 2007-01-29 22:55:37 | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-29 22:48:30 | Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL |