| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: savepoint improvements |
| Date: | 2007-01-22 15:48:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20070122154825.GD29762@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:40:37AM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> The short version is I would like the ability to run some sql commands
<snip>
> any error updating foo or bar will blow up the whole thing. Maybe
> this is desirable, but it is often nice to be able to do some error
> handling here. In the pre-savepoint NT implementation I could:
<snip>
Nested transactions are trivially implemented on top of savepoints. If
we're talking about psql, maybe all we need to do is create the
commands in psql:
\begin_nest
\commit_nest
\rollback_nest
Would that suit your purpose?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-22 15:49:43 | Re: pg_dump ANALYZE statements |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-22 15:46:13 | Re: savepoint improvements |