Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs

From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: installcheck vs regression DLLs
Date: 2007-01-11 07:51:58
Message-ID: 20070111075212.5ED12DCC143@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > what really is the motivation for keeping some of the tested binaries in the sourcetree when doing installcheck?
>
> As opposed to what? We're certainly not going to *install* regress.so,
> and I can't see requiring contrib to be there either. These are test
> files, not part of the installation-under-test.

That would've been my suggestion since I'd say they're both. But if that's not happening and nobody has a better idea, then workaround it is. I'll try to make
it as non-ugly as I can.

/Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Enke 2007-01-11 08:50:51 copy table from file: with row replacement?
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2007-01-11 07:42:40 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp major release 8.3.0,