| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| Date: | 2007-01-08 17:43:57 |
| Message-ID: | 200701081743.l08HhvB21226@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Right, because even the decision of whether they should be in the queue
> > is a decision for us. The hold queue additions are less stringent than
> > the main patch queue.
>
> Isn't that always the case though, not just after FF when the hold queue
> starts getting activity again? That would imply the need to a permanent
> triage(?) queue, and a version specific one imho.
The hold queue is not used during normal development. I don't see value
in a triage queue.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-08 17:45:34 | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-01-08 17:32:42 | Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Index Advisor] |