From: | mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc |
---|---|
To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
Subject: | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Date: | 2006-12-30 17:26:12 |
Message-ID: | 20061230172612.GA3579@mark.mielke.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:05:14PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Except tht X.509 is already done (in a sense). The client can supply a
> certificate that the server can check, and vice-versa. You can't link
> this with the postgresql username yet, but I havn't seen any proposals
> about how to do that.
I suggest associating the SHA-1 fingerprint with the ROLE. I would love
to have this.
> The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
> certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
> useless extra step in my case).
I prefer to allow self-signed certificates approved by fingerprint,
rather than content - having a central authority vouche for a person's
right to use my system does not appeal to me. Yes, this does make
X.509 far too complicated. I have a tendency to put garbage in the
X.509 fields, and use only the private key / public key / fingerprint
of public certificate, which would match your use of PGP keys... :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
mark(at)mielke(dot)cc / markm(at)ncf(dot)ca / markm(at)nortel(dot)com __________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-30 18:05:23 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |
Previous Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-30 17:05:14 | Re: TODO: GNU TLS |