Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Roman Kononov <kononov195-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing
Date: 2006-12-28 01:42:27
Message-ID: 200612280142.kBS1gRE16680@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Roman Kononov <kononov195-pgsql(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> > On 12/27/2006 03:23 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Are you sure? As I remember, computation automatically upgrades to
> >> 'double'. See this program and output:
>
> > This is platform- and compiler- dependent:
>
> ... and probably irrelevant, too. We should store the result into a
> float4 variable and then test for isinf() on that; that eliminates the
> question of whether the compiler did the multiply in a wider format or
> not.

True for overflow to Infinity, but underflow checking is better for
float4 using float8. See previous email for details.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-28 01:45:33 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-28 01:41:23 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-28 01:45:33 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-28 01:41:23 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing