Re: RC1 blocker issues

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: RC1 blocker issues
Date: 2006-11-24 20:37:21
Message-ID: 20061124203721.GC4318@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
> > Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a
> > catversion change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if
> > we change it we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a
> > noticeable user-visible difference between different "8.2"
> > installations.
>
> Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this
> changes the expected output for the rules regression test.
>
> So, yea or nay? I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold
> off applying until I hear some comments.

+1 on applying it. Beta testers should understand what "beta" and
"test" mean. :)

Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-24 20:42:56 Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-11-24 20:36:48 Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues