From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: RC1 blocker issues |
Date: | 2006-11-24 20:37:21 |
Message-ID: | 20061124203721.GC4318@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
> > Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a
> > catversion change)? I'm currently leaning to the thought that if
> > we change it we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a
> > noticeable user-visible difference between different "8.2"
> > installations.
>
> Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this
> changes the expected output for the rules regression test.
>
> So, yea or nay? I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold
> off applying until I hear some comments.
+1 on applying it. Beta testers should understand what "beta" and
"test" mean. :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-24 20:42:56 | Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2006-11-24 20:36:48 | Re: [CORE] RC1 blocker issues |