From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Molle Bestefich <molle(dot)bestefich(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: quick review |
Date: | 2006-11-21 21:15:45 |
Message-ID: | 200611212115.kALLFj127939@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 21:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Molle Bestefich wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > First time PostgreSQL user.
> > >
> > > Here's a review of my experience so far.
> > >
> > > 1.) Reading the manual
> > >
> > > Looks good feature-wise, but there's a suspicious lack of reference to
> > > any kind of repair utility for damaged data files. Hmm. I've been
> > > using computers for long enough that I know that in the real world
> > > there's no such thing as "data corruption doesn't occur", so it's
> > > rather suspicious.
> >
> > Unless you have buggy hardware, there is no need for a repair tool.
> > That is our position.
>
> And when I mentioned that to two of my largest customers, they both
> looked at me like I had lost my mind.
>
> Something to think about.
My assumption is that they are used to buggy software that has bugs
unfixed for years, and the repair tools are the answer to that, no?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-21 21:18:15 | Re: quick review |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-21 21:12:01 | Re: statement_timeout |