Re: Open source databases '60 per cent

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kaare Rasmussen <kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent
Date: 2006-11-21 20:56:18
Message-ID: 200611212056.kALKuII02308@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> >
> > I know EnterpriseDB is trying to have PostgreSQL mentioned in all their
> > articles, but I supposed because it is an article that includes all open
> > source databases (or based on open source databases like EnterpriseDB),
> > it wasn't possible.
>
> Honestly, I applaud the EnterpriseDB PR machine, and there is no reason
> they should have to provide a mention to PostgreSQL. If they choose to,
> I thank them as a community member. If not, it is their product and I
> wish them the best.

EnterpriseDB tries to get PostgreSQL mentioned if possible. There are
strong ethical and business reasons to do that.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-11-21 20:59:43 Re: Open source databases '60 per cent
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-11-21 20:14:17 Re: Collateral for LISA 06

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-11-21 20:58:00 Re: [HACKERS] advanced index (descending and table-presorted
Previous Message Greg Mitchell 2006-11-21 20:44:59 Re: advanced index (descending and table-presorted descending)