From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Extended protocol logging |
Date: | 2006-11-16 23:19:34 |
Message-ID: | 200611162319.kAGNJYp08860@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 10:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 23:51 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> With what logging settings? log_duration has rather different behavior
> > >> from what it used to do.
> >
> > > I think it would be useful to have the log results from a test program
> > > in the protocol section,
> >
> > The contents of the postmaster log are surely not part of the FE protocol.
> > Clients can't even see the log without resorting to nonstandard hacks.
>
> OK, can we please put the example from -hackers into the docs,
> somewhere, with particular note of which protocol messages result in
> which logging output?
If people want to know the output, run a program and look at the
postmaster logs. If we document it, we have to keep it current, even if
we improve it later. I will say I had trouble testing this logging
because it requires a C program to use that protocol. Here is the test
program I used.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2006-11-17 01:29:35 | ALTER TABLE RENAME column |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-16 22:32:08 | Re: A suggestion on PG_TRY() exception handling code. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-17 01:23:35 | Proposed patch for xact-vs-multixact bugs |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-11-16 22:10:27 | Re: Cast null to int4 upgrading from Version 7.2 |