From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
---|---|
To: | Marcio <marcio(at)oracullos(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sugestion for PostgreSQ |
Date: | 2006-11-08 01:16:46 |
Message-ID: | 20061108011646.GB15732@wolff.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:50:01 -0200,
Marcio <marcio(at)oracullos(dot)com(dot)br> wrote:
> I have a sugestion for pgsql 8.2 or next versions ...
> Is complicated encrypt the procedures/functions on Database like Oracle or
> similar?
> I sugest this because we develop ERP/MRP with complex routines and we like
> hide all of this routines...this is our "business secret".
> I know if we write this code in C, for example....is possible to hide. But,
> we prefer pl/pgsql native.
> Thank´s,
One solution is to run the database and the application that connects to
it on a machine your business controls and only allow customers to connect
to the application (and not directly to the database).
Another is to have a contract that limits what your customers can do with
the information gained from seeing your propietary code.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas H. | 2006-11-08 11:58:56 | Re: BUG #2712: could not fsync segment: Permission |
Previous Message | chad.wilson | 2006-11-07 23:11:48 | BUG #2742: psql -c is not case sensitive |