Re: ./configure argument checking

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
Subject: Re: ./configure argument checking
Date: 2006-10-13 18:40:42
Message-ID: 200610132040.43552.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Not sure what to do about that --- I doubt that raising this warning
> to error would be a good idea, seeing how firmly the upstream
> developers believe it shouldn't even be a warning. Is there any sort
> of "quiet mode" possible that would report only warnings? Would it
> be a good idea if it were possible?

peter(at)colt:~/devel/pg82/pgsql$ ./configure --enable-foo --quiet
*** Option ignored: --enable-foo
peter(at)colt:~/devel/pg82/pgsql$

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2006-10-13 18:45:45 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-10-13 18:36:51 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD