Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump exclusion switches and functions/types
Date: 2006-10-09 16:54:00
Message-ID: 20061009165400.GZ72517@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 07, 2006 at 05:29:03PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So the only regex patterns you can't write directly are dot, R* and R?
> for which you can use these locutions:
>
> . => ?
> R* => (R+|)
> R? => (R|)
>
> (Perhaps this should be documented somewhere...)

Yes, please.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2006-10-09 16:55:47 Re: array_accum aggregate
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-10-09 16:47:44 Re: Upgrading a database dump/restore