Re: timestamptz alias

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Jim Nasby <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: timestamptz alias
Date: 2006-10-08 17:03:26
Message-ID: 20061008170325.GI72517@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:35:55AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
> >
> > It would be nice to denote types/aliases that are and aren't ANSI. A
> > number are marked in the docs, but it would be good to add the info
> > to that summary table.
>
> Right under the table this sentence appears:
>
> Compatibility: The following types (or spellings thereof) are specified
> by SQL: bit, bit varying, boolean, char, character varying, character,
> varchar, date, double precision, integer, interval, numeric, decimal,
> real, smallint, time (with or without time zone), timestamp (with or
> without time zone).
>
> What's unclear about that?

Oops. This is what happens when I answer emails on a plane. :(
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-10-11 12:19:39 Re: Added links to the release notes
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-07 03:21:42 Added links to the release notes

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-10-08 17:12:28 Re: Should there be a charcat?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-10-08 16:54:19 Re: Checking max_stack_depth automatically