From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: scripts/common.c minor memory leak |
Date: | 2006-10-04 09:46:35 |
Message-ID: | 20061004094635.GB7063@svana.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 05:27:31PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It is surely not the only memory leak. We know there are some and in
> most cases (like this) they aren't worth the trouble to clean up. If it
> were used in psql or the backend I'd be worried, but it isn't, so I'm not.
Ofcourse not. You don't see any messages about the other >100 leaks
found because I figure they're not worth the effort. This function is
used widely enough and a simple enough fix that I figured I might be
worth fixing.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-10-04 09:51:20 | Re: tsearch2 error msg |
Previous Message | Markus Schaber | 2006-10-04 09:41:28 | Re: timestamptz alias |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-10-04 10:12:29 | Re: vcbuild bison check |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-10-04 07:30:30 | Re: vcbuild bison check |