| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Albe Laurenz <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane *EXTERN* <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql service parameter |
| Date: | 2006-09-27 16:01:42 |
| Message-ID: | 20060927160142.GE13693@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 04:54:35PM +0200, Albe Laurenz wrote:
> I think that both would be nice. Indeed, I wanted to suggest
> a switch for PGSERVICE myself.
It some point I was wondering about using the @ symbol. If you have a
service entry called "testserver", you could do:
psql @testserver
But maybe that introduces too many quoting issues. Ofcourse, being able
to provide a complete connect string would be good too...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-09-27 16:04:51 | Re: Block B-Tree concept |
| Previous Message | Albe Laurenz | 2006-09-27 14:54:35 | Re: psql service parameter |