| From: | Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Restart after poweroutage |
| Date: | 2006-09-26 02:09:24 |
| Message-ID: | 200609251909.24355.aklaver@comcast.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Monday 25 September 2006 02:48 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net> writes:
> > On Sunday 24 September 2006 09:17 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Jon Lapham <lapham(at)jandr(dot)org> writes:
> >>> FATAL: pre-existing shared memory block (key 5432001, ID 65536) is
> >>> still in use
> >>
> >> This is extremely odd, because a shared memory block could not possibly
> >> have survived a reboot.
> >
> > In the its a small world department I experienced the same problem
> > shortly after reading this message.
>
> I spent quite some time today trying to duplicate this failure (by
> pulling the plug on an up-to-date Fedora Core 5 machine). No luck.
> I suppose there is some contributing factor on your machines that
> we haven't identified yet ...
>
> regards, tom lane
Is there something I could do to help capture useful information should I see
a repeat of this behavior?
--
Adrian Klaver
aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-26 02:15:14 | Re: Restart after poweroutage |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-09-26 01:47:02 | Re: deadlock avoidance |