Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Date: 2006-09-14 14:22:22
Message-ID: 20060914142222.GA525@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I see a bug though, which is that RecordSubTransactionAbort() calls
> > GetCurrentTransactionId() before having verified that it needs to do
> > anything. This means that we'll generate and then discard an XID
> > uselessly in a failed subxact that didn't touch disk.
>
> Well, it would be a bug except that RecordSubTransactionAbort isn't
> called unless the current subxact has an XID. Perhaps a comment would
> be appropriate but there's nothing to fix here.
>
> I think Theo's problem is probably somewhere else, too --- apparently
> it's not so much that TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId takes a long
> time as that something is calling it lots of times with no check for
> interrupt.

Could it be something like heap_lock_tuple? It calls MultiXactIdWait,
which calls GetMultXactIdMembers and TransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId
on each member. (heap_update and heap_delete do the same thing). I
must admit I didn't read Theo's description on his scenario though.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pascal Meunier 2006-09-14 14:24:43 minor feature request: Secure defaults during function creation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-14 14:13:49 Re: Release notes

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-14 14:43:19 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-14 13:57:59 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2