Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Date: 2006-09-08 01:15:14
Message-ID: 200609080115.k881FEj00107@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > #2, I think, but I am confused if you don't know the query, how valuable
> > is the log_duration.
>
> Statistics?

Oh, interesting.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-09-08 02:12:17 Re: Domains and subtypes, a brief proposal
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-09-08 01:11:35 Re: log_duration is redundant, no?