Re: Ding-dong, contrib is dead ...

At 2006-09-05 10:23:19 -0400, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us wrote:
>
> Something like it ought to go into core, but personally I'd opt for
> taking the opportunity to redesign the API, which was a bit crufty to
> begin with.

I'm happy to do the work right away (not that there's much) if someone
suggests a better API. (I don't personally have a need for user-level
locks, and if I did, I'd be happy with just user_lock/user_unlock. So
if anyone has a more specific idea, I'm all ears.)

> That would eliminate all question of whether the clean room was
> clean enough.

It was really, really clean! Honest! :-)

-- ams