| From: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article |
| Date: | 2006-08-28 21:09:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20060828170926.2a3171d7.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
In response to Chris Mair <chrisnospam(at)1006(dot)org>:
>
> > http://newsvac.newsforge.com/newsvac/06/08/28/1738259.shtml
> >
> > Don't know the validity of this dvd order test they did, but the article
> > claims Postgresql only did 120 OPM.
> > Seems a little fishy to me.
>
> There was just one submission for PostgreSQL made by one guy who didn't
> manage to finish it (c't says connection pooling didn't work).
>
> See: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2006-06/msg00052.php
>
> MySQL's winning submission was by a team from MySQL AB.
It's just kind of a shame that we didn't have a chance to put together
a serious entry ...
This is the first I've heard of the contest.
--
Bill Moran
Collaborative Fusion Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brandon Aiken | 2006-08-28 21:10:21 | Re: Postgresql mentioned on Newsforge MySQL article |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-08-28 21:06:32 | Re: Atomicity? |