From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Autovacuum on by default? |
Date: | 2006-08-27 05:38:32 |
Message-ID: | 200608270738.33185.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> That seems a big jump. BTW, I know .08 and .04 were suggested, but I
> didn't see confirmation that it was a good idea. I know my initial
> values were grossly over-conservative, but I am concerned about
> bogging down the server with lots of vacuums, especially since we
> don't have the delay settings on by default, nor do we have a
> maintenance windows yet.
OK, it seems that while everyone wants autovacuum be more aggressive by
default, no one has any good data to support one setting or another. I
so I suggest that we just cut scale factor and base threshold in half
right now (so it'd be 0.2, 0.1, 500, 250) and see about a
better-researched setting for the next release.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2006-08-27 07:40:30 | Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql |
Previous Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2006-08-27 04:59:11 | Re: integration of pgcluster into postgresql |