| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Date: | 2006-08-25 18:37:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20060825183711.GL16535@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:13:39PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > I agree with Martijn that putting these into libpq's API
> > seems like useless clutter.
>
> Where else to put it? We need it in libpq anyway if we want this
> behavior in all client applications (by default).
Is that so? I thought we were only talkng about psql. Even then, I'm
wondering if we should alter the current behaviour at all if stdout is
not a tty (i.e. run as a pipe).
And as a counter-example: pg_dump should absolutly not use the client
locale, it should always dump as the same encoding as the server...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 18:43:34 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 18:30:19 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 18:43:34 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-25 18:30:19 | Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ? |