Re: Autovacuum on by default?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum on by default?
Date: 2006-08-25 15:36:44
Message-ID: 200608251736.45031.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:32 schrieb Matthew T. O'Connor:
> While there is talk of removing this all together, I think it was also
> agreed that as long as these values are there, they should be reduced.
> I think the defaults in 8.1 are 1000/500, I think 200/100 was suggested.

I'm thinking leaving them higher would offset the jump in the scale factor a
bit. But if the idea is to get rid of the base threshold, then that's not
really a forward-looking strategy, I suppose.

I don't mind if we go down with the scale factor a little less and move the
threshold down more, but at least tying the scale factor to the fill factor
doesn't make all those numbers too random.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-25 15:38:20 Re: [GENERAL] invalid byte sequence ?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-25 15:34:30 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build