Re: Large database design advice

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Harald Armin Massa <haraldarminmassa(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Joe Kramer <cckramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Large database design advice
Date: 2006-08-24 17:16:05
Message-ID: 20060824171605.GA30678@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 06:21:01PM +0200, Harald Armin Massa wrote:
> with a normal "serial", without "big", you can have
> 9.223.372.036.854.775.807 records individually numbered.

Not true; see the documentation:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/datatype.html#DATATYPE-SERIAL

"The type names serial and serial4 are equivalent: both create
integer columns. The type names bigserial and serial8 work just
the same way, except that they create a bigint column. bigserial
should be used if you anticipate the use of more than 2^31 identifiers
over the lifetime of the table."

I think you're confusing the size of the sequence (always 64 bits)
with the size of the column (32-bit integer for serial, 64-bit
bigint for bigserial) that will hold the sequence's value.

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-24 17:17:49 Re: invalid byte sequence ?
Previous Message Alexander Farber 2006-08-24 16:57:53 Re: undefined reference to `PQprepare' with postgresql-dev 7.4.7-6sarge2