| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | gao iqiang <iqianggao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unique constraint when updating tables |
| Date: | 2006-08-23 05:12:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20060823051214.GA16542@svana.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:39:00AM +0800, gao iqiang wrote:
> Hello,
> I met the following problem when i am using PostgreSQL as a backend
> database:
> I have a table "tabrel(a int primary key, b int)", and now there are for
> example 100 records with column 'a' be from 1 to 100. When i'm going to add
> one to each 'a' and intended to get 'a' varing from 2 to 101, i use SQL
> query as "update tabrel set a=a+1" , but i got " ERROR: duplicate key
> violates unique constraint tabrel_a_key".
Yes, PostgreSQL doesn't currently support deferred unique constraints.
You can find workarounds in the archives.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | surabhi.ahuja | 2006-08-23 05:13:06 | PSQLException: An I/O error occured while sending to the backend |
| Previous Message | Gene | 2006-08-23 04:10:56 | Re: table partitioning |