Re: snapshot replication with pg_dump

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Paul Silveira <plabrh1(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: snapshot replication with pg_dump
Date: 2006-08-21 13:57:21
Message-ID: 20060821135721.GD24375@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:40:22AM -0700, Paul Silveira wrote:
>
> Yes the needs are simple. I was also thinking about using DBI. The most
> important thing to me is that everything is kept in a transaction so that
> users can still read the data while I'm snapshotting it at the same time.
> If my transaction is isolated from all the reads happening, then it
> shouldn't matter how long it takes for me to move the data over (granted,
> that will increase latency, but in this project that's not really too
> sensitive) and it will be transparent to the end users.

Looks to me like the -c option to pg_dump should do what you want.

<snip>

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2006-08-21 13:57:43 Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2006-08-21 13:43:20 Re: PostgreSQL on 64 bit Linux