Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-17 05:29:18
Message-ID: 200608170729.21224.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> The Debian system would be basically zero operational change.
> pgsql-bugs would continue to exist exactly as it does now except it
> would go through debbugs.

Debbugs is fine and all, but they don't seem to publish their code on a
regular basis.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-17 05:31:21 Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Previous Message Mohan R 2006-08-17 05:16:13 Re: unsubscribe