Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Carl Youngblood <carl(at)youngbloods(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Beginner optimization questions, esp. regarding Tsearch2
Date: 2006-08-17 04:57:23
Message-ID: 20060817045723.GY21363@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 09:34:24AM -0600, Carl Youngblood wrote:
> The relevant portion of my sysctl.conf file looks like this:
>
> kernel.shmall = 2097152
> kernel.shmmax = 2147483648
> kernel.shmmni = 4096
> kernel.sem = 250 32000 100 128
> fs.file-max = 65536
>
> I understood it was a good idea to set shmmax to half of available
> memory (2GB in this case). I assume that I need to set shared_buffers

I don't see any reason to do that, so long as you have control over
what's being run on the system. Just set it to 3000000000 or so.

> slightly lower than 2GB for postgresql to start successfully.
>
> Carl
>
> On 8/15/06, Jim C. Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 12:47:54PM -0600, Carl Youngblood wrote:
> >> I tried setting it to 2GB and postgres wouldn't start. Didn't
> >> investigate in much greater detail as to why it wouldn't start, but
> >> after switching it back to 1GB it started fine.
> >
> >Most likely because you didn't set the kernel's shared memory settings
> >high enough.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> match
>

--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mohan R 2006-08-17 05:16:13 Re: unsubscribe
Previous Message Steve Poe 2006-08-17 02:10:33 Re: Postgresql Performance on an HP DL385 and